Account login: Click here
 
  Search  
 
 
 
  « Blog Home

190 views
Posted by John Reid on 18 Sep 2007 7:28 AM

Repro Hammer Quads
 
Hammer has announced the release of a series of repro British quads posters from some of their classic Horror films from the 50s to the 70s. Titles include Curse of Frankenstein, Countess Dracula, Vampire Circus and culminating with the release of Dracula in 2008 to celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the film.
 
Now that all sounds fine but there has been considerable discussion and concern on some of the forums and various other sites about the fact that the posters will be almost exact replicas to the originals with little or no identifying marks on the front of the posters.
 
Part of the publicity for these posters states:
 
"Each title in the series has been scanned from an original poster at a very high resolution. They are then digitally restored. All the creases and fold marks are removed along with any pin holes, tears, dirty marks, etc.."
  
I would have thought that the sensible approach would have been to include some identifying mark on the front of the poster which would clearly indicate that it was a repro without detracting from the image. Perhaps they could have included the date, or a notation that the poster was an officially authorised Hammer reproduction. Apparently, they may have a stamp on the back but no mark at all on the front.
 
Collectors would be well aware that many hundreds of reproduction posters have been sold on internet auctions as original. Many are deliberate attempts to deceive whilst others are simply an example of a lack of knowledge from the seller. One striking example has been various Portal reproduction posters that were printed about 30 years ago. Although these are not the size of the standard movie posters, they still get misprepresented on a regular basis, despite the fact that many have the name "Portal" on the base of the poster and sometimes the zip code.
 
The Portal posters are often described in terms such as...
 
"this is a very old poster that was recently found in my grandfathers attic. He has had the poster for many years and, although it is showing some signs of age, it displays remarkably well. Although I am not a poster dealer, I have been told that this is a very rare original piece etc etc, blah, blah"
  
Many dealers over the years have cringed as they see these repros sell for huge prices to unsuspecting buyers.
 
Well now, Hammer will be producing replica British Quads. I wonder how many will eventually turn up on eBay or other sites represented as originals. Unscrupulous sellers might fold them, and perhaps remove the stamp from the back, throw in a few pinholes and add some writing on the back to make them look original. They could also linen back them and, although I havent actually touched the repros, I imagine that it might be difficult to tell the difference between the repros and the originals once they have been backed. Goodness knows, they might even start turning up at major auctions.
 
I suppose Hammer have the right to do what they like when producing these quads but surely they could have added a date to the poster without detracting from the quality.
 
Let me know what you think.
 
Regards
 
John

» Posted in MOVIE POSTER NEWS  |  Add Comment


2 comments

Initially, it sounds a worrying idea to me John. Ill have to reserve judgement untill i see one of these posters. Hammer were always quick to jump on a new exploitation  scheme of course and i guess here they have seen  that enough people want their poster images,  and prepared to pay a lot for an original.So heres a novel income generator for them, ahead im sure of yet again relaunching the backcatalogue!
  But for the collector of the originals it could be a bad day, especially if there is nothing to determine that its a repro and that all the printers info et al is to be included.Im now on the search and will get back when i find one.
But this could now be extended to all  film posters ?
A
 :: Posted by Webby Bill on 6 Oct 2007 8:26 AM

Yes, I think I might order one. Hopefully the difference will be fairly obvious to anyone who knows anything about original posters but I really cant see why they couldnt have put a date or an identifying mark on the bottom of the poster just to avoid deception and confusion.

Hopefully this exercise will be limited to Hammer posters. Most repros of movie posters are genereally a different size and usually with some identification although there were a series of James Bond one sheets printed around 1980 that were very close indeed to the originals.

PS
Like the username - a very apt description indeed!
 :: Posted by John Reid on 6 Oct 2007 9:02 AM



Add Comment

Please enter your username or email address and password. If you have not registered before, also enter a screen name; this will be displayed with your comments. Your email address will not be displayed on the site.

* Email Address
* Password
 New? Enter your screen name here.
Screen name
* Comments:
 


   

Site built by Graphics Online